Enforceability of Prenuptial Agreements

Enforceability of Prenuptial Agreements

A prenuptial agreement is only as useful as its ability to be enforced.

Couples may sign an agreement before marriage believing that its terms will automatically control their property, financial obligations, inheritance rights, or spousal support if the marriage later ends. But signing a document does not necessarily make every provision legally enforceable.

Courts may examine how the agreement was created, whether the parties understood it, whether the agreement was voluntary, whether financial information was properly disclosed, whether the terms are unconscionable, and whether the agreement complies with applicable state law.

For a general overview of family-law principles, see Cornell Law School’s Legal Information Institute (Wex) — Family Law.

The law governing prenuptial agreements varies considerably among states. Some states follow the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act (UPAA) or versions of it, while others follow different statutory or judicial rules. Consequently, there is no single nationwide formula guaranteeing enforcement.

The central question is:

Will a court treat the agreement as a valid and enforceable contract when enforcement is requested?

---

What Is a Prenuptial Agreement?

A prenuptial agreement, commonly called a prenup, is a contract entered into by two people before they marry.

It may address matters such as:

• ownership of property;
• classification of separate and marital property;
• responsibility for debts;
• business interests;
• inheritance rights;
• spousal support;
• financial obligations;
• and property division upon divorce or death.

The agreement is generally intended to establish financial rules before the marriage rather than leaving every issue to default state law.

A prenup can therefore alter the legal consequences that would otherwise apply if the marriage ended.

But contractual freedom in family law has limits.

A court does not necessarily enforce an agreement merely because both parties signed it.

---

Why Enforceability Matters

Prenuptial agreements are usually created when the relationship is functioning well.

Enforcement is often tested years later, when circumstances may be very different.

For example:

A couple signs a prenuptial agreement before marriage. Fifteen years later, they divorce. One spouse asks the court to enforce the agreement, while the other argues that it was signed under pressure, without adequate financial disclosure, and contains unfair provisions.

The court must then examine the agreement’s legal validity.

This creates an important distinction:

Signing an agreement and enforcing an agreement are not the same thing.

---

The Basic Requirements for Enforcement

Although state law differs, courts commonly consider several recurring questions.

Issue	Central Question
Writing	Is the agreement properly documented?
Voluntariness	Did each person enter it freely?
Capacity	Could both parties legally enter the agreement?
Disclosure	Was financial information adequately disclosed?
Understanding	Did the parties understand the agreement?
Unconscionability	Is the agreement or a provision excessively unfair?
Independent counsel	Did either or both parties have legal representation?
Timing	Was the agreement presented sufficiently before the wedding?
Fraud or duress	Was consent obtained improperly?
Formalities	Were applicable statutory requirements satisfied?
Public policy	Does enforcement violate a legal policy or statutory rule?

No single factor necessarily determines every case.

The court generally applies the law of the relevant jurisdiction to the circumstances surrounding the agreement.

---

Written Agreements

A fundamental requirement in many jurisdictions is that a prenuptial agreement be in writing.

Prenuptial agreements concern significant legal rights and are generally subject to formal contractual requirements.

An oral conversation such as:

“If we ever divorce, you’ll keep the house.”

will not ordinarily have the same legal status as a properly executed written premarital agreement.

Written documentation provides evidence of:

• the parties’ intentions;
• the agreed terms;
• the obligations undertaken;
• and the rights being modified.

The precise formalities depend on state law.

---

Signatures and Execution

The parties generally must execute the agreement according to applicable legal requirements.

Execution can involve:

• signatures;
• dates;
• notarization;
• witnesses;
• or other formalities.

Not every jurisdiction requires the same procedures.

This is one reason a prenup should not simply be copied from a document created for another state.

An agreement that satisfies one jurisdiction’s requirements may not necessarily satisfy another’s.

---

Voluntary Consent

One of the most important requirements for enforceability is voluntary consent.

A contract is fundamentally based on agreement.

If one party did not genuinely have a meaningful opportunity to decide whether to enter the agreement, a court may question its enforceability.

Voluntariness can become particularly important when a prenup is presented shortly before a wedding.

---

Duress

Duress occurs when improper pressure deprives a person of meaningful freedom of choice.

In the prenuptial context, allegations of duress may arise when one party claims:

• the agreement was presented at the last moment;
• the wedding was threatened with cancellation;
• there was extreme emotional pressure;
• the party had insufficient opportunity to review the document;
• or the circumstances made meaningful consent impossible.

The existence of pressure does not automatically establish legal duress.

Courts examine the particular facts and the applicable legal standard.

---

The “Sign This or the Wedding Is Off” Problem

Consider a hypothetical:

One week before the wedding, one party gives the other a 40-page prenuptial agreement and says, “Sign this tonight or there will be no wedding.”

That circumstance could become highly relevant in a later enforcement dispute.

The question would not simply be whether the document was signed.

The court might ask whether the circumstances surrounding the signature were sufficiently coercive to undermine genuine consent.

Timing, bargaining power, opportunity to obtain counsel, financial disclosure, and other facts could all matter.

---

Timing of the Agreement

The timing of a prenuptial agreement can affect its enforceability.

An agreement presented months before a wedding generally provides more opportunity for:

• review;
• negotiation;
• independent legal advice;
• financial investigation;
• and voluntary decision-making.

An agreement presented immediately before the ceremony may raise greater questions about:

• pressure;
• lack of meaningful choice;
• inadequate review;
• and informed consent.

There is no universal rule that every prenup must be signed a particular number of days before a wedding.

State law determines the applicable requirements.

But as a practical matter, early negotiation generally provides stronger evidence of informed and voluntary consent.

---

Financial Disclosure

Financial disclosure is another major issue.

Before entering a prenuptial agreement, each person may need sufficient information concerning the other’s financial circumstances.

This can include:

• income;
• assets;
• real estate;
• businesses;
• investments;
• retirement accounts;
• liabilities;
• and significant financial interests.

The purpose is to ensure that a person is not agreeing to surrender important financial rights without understanding the economic circumstances involved.

---

Why Disclosure Matters

Imagine that one person owns:

• a $4 million business;
• several investment accounts;
• valuable real estate;
• and substantial retirement assets.

The other person is asked to waive potential claims against marital property without being told that these assets exist.

The enforceability question becomes more complicated.

A court may examine whether the agreement was entered into with adequate knowledge of the financial circumstances and whether the applicable state law requires disclosure, permits waiver of disclosure, or establishes a different standard.

---

Full Disclosure Is Not Identical in Every State

It is important not to assume that every state imposes exactly the same disclosure requirement.

Some jurisdictions apply statutory rules concerning financial disclosure.

Others evaluate whether the parties had sufficient knowledge or whether disclosure was waived under legally permissible circumstances.

The agreement itself may also contain provisions concerning disclosure.

Therefore, the general principle is:

A party should not assume that silence about major financial information is harmless.

Financial transparency is one of the central protections surrounding informed contractual consent.

---

Independent Legal Counsel

Independent legal counsel can be extremely important.

A lawyer representing one spouse cannot ethically serve both parties as though both had the same interests.

The parties may have fundamentally different financial objectives.

For example, one person may want to:

• protect a business;
• preserve inherited property;
• limit spousal support;
• or establish separate property rights.

The other person may want:

• financial security;
• access to marital property;
• support;
• or protection against economic disadvantage.

Independent representation allows each party to receive advice concerning their own interests.

---

Is Independent Counsel Always Required?

Not necessarily.

Whether independent counsel is legally required varies by jurisdiction and by the particular provision at issue.

Some states strongly emphasize independent legal representation, particularly when spousal-support rights are being waived or when enforcement is challenged.

Other jurisdictions may permit enforcement without both parties having separate lawyers, provided other requirements are satisfied.

Thus:

Having independent counsel is not universally identical to being legally mandatory.

Nevertheless, it can substantially strengthen the evidence that the agreement was understood and voluntarily accepted.

---

Opportunity to Consult a Lawyer

Even where independent counsel is not strictly required, the opportunity to obtain legal advice may matter.

A person who is:

• given the agreement early;
• encouraged to consult counsel;
• given adequate financial disclosure;
• allowed to negotiate;
• and then voluntarily signs;

may be in a stronger position than someone who is given a document moments before a ceremony and told to sign immediately.

The surrounding circumstances can therefore matter as much as the document itself.

---

Understanding the Agreement

A party generally cannot meaningfully consent to an agreement they do not understand.

Courts may consider whether the terms were:

• clear;
• understandable;
• translated when necessary;
• explained by counsel;
• and presented in circumstances allowing meaningful review.

Complexity alone does not necessarily make an agreement unenforceable.

But deliberately obscure or misleading language can create problems.

---

Language and Translation

Language barriers can become relevant where one party does not understand the language in which the agreement was drafted.

A court may examine whether the person:

• understood the document;
• received a translation;
• had access to counsel;
• or otherwise understood the legal consequences.

The issue is not simply whether the person could physically sign the document.

It is whether the circumstances support genuine informed consent.

---

Fraud and Misrepresentation

Fraud can undermine contractual consent.

A party might challenge a prenup by arguing that the other party:

• concealed significant assets;
• provided false financial information;
• misrepresented income;
• lied about debts;
• or otherwise induced agreement through material deception.

If the alleged deception affected the decision to enter the agreement, it may become highly significant.

---

Unconscionability

Another major concept is unconscionability.

An agreement may be described as unconscionable when it is so unfair or oppressive that enforcing it would be legally unacceptable under the applicable standard.

Courts may examine both:

• the fairness of the terms; and
• the circumstances under which the agreement was created.

This distinction is important.

A provision does not necessarily become unenforceable merely because it favors one spouse.

Prenuptial agreements exist precisely because parties may want to establish different financial rules from the default rules of divorce law.

The issue is whether the unfairness crosses the legal threshold recognized by the relevant jurisdiction.

---

Procedural and Substantive Unconscionability

Courts sometimes distinguish between two dimensions of unconscionability.

Procedural unconscionability

This concerns how the agreement was formed.

Examples may include:

• pressure;
• surprise;
• lack of meaningful choice;
• inadequate disclosure;
• or inability to obtain advice.

Substantive unconscionability

This concerns what the agreement actually says.

Examples may include:

• extremely one-sided provisions;
• oppressive financial terms;
• or provisions that produce an exceptionally unfair result.

Some jurisdictions use both concepts; others apply different formulations.

---

Does an Unfair Prenup Automatically Fail?

No.

This is a common misconception.

Prenuptial agreements often deliberately allocate economic rights differently from what would otherwise happen under state law.

A spouse cannot necessarily invalidate an agreement simply by saying:

“This isn’t fair.”

The legal question is whether the agreement reaches the applicable standard for unenforceability.

A court may enforce an agreement that substantially favors one spouse if the agreement was legally validly created and the applicable law permits those terms.

---

Waiver of Spousal Support

Spousal support is one of the most sensitive subjects in prenuptial agreements.

A prenup may attempt to:

• waive alimony entirely;
• limit the amount;
• establish a formula;
• or specify conditions under which support will or will not be available.

State laws differ significantly concerning these provisions.

Some jurisdictions scrutinize support waivers particularly closely.

A provision that appears acceptable when the parties marry may produce a dramatically different effect after many years of marriage.

For that reason, courts may examine the circumstances and applicable law carefully when enforcement is sought.

---

Public Policy Limitations

Contractual freedom is not unlimited.

Certain provisions may be unenforceable because they conflict with public policy or statutory requirements.

For example, courts generally do not allow private agreements to eliminate fundamental legal protections involving children merely because the parents included language about them in a prenup.

The parties may have considerable freedom to arrange their financial affairs, but that freedom does not necessarily extend to every aspect of family law.

---

Child Custody and Child Support

Prenuptial agreements generally cannot conclusively determine future child-custody or child-support issues.

The reason is fundamental:

Children have legal interests independent of their parents’ private contract.

A court deciding custody generally focuses on applicable statutory standards, particularly the child’s best interests.

Similarly, child support is ordinarily governed by law and the child’s needs rather than solely by a private agreement between parents.

A prenup may contain provisions concerning children, but those provisions do not necessarily control a future family court.

---

A Prenup Cannot Contract Away Every Legal Right

A prenuptial agreement can be powerful, but it is not an unlimited private constitution for a marriage.

Depending on state law, certain rights may be:

• nonwaivable;
• subject to judicial review;
• protected by public policy;
• or governed by statutes that override private agreements.

This is why the question should never simply be:

“Did we sign it?”

The better question is:

“Was the provision one that the law allows the parties to modify, and was the agreement created in a legally enforceable manner?”

---

Changes in Circumstances

One challenge with prenuptial agreements is that circumstances can change dramatically.

A couple might sign an agreement when:

• both are young;
• neither has children;
• both work;
• their financial positions are similar;
• and neither expects divorce.

Twenty years later:

• one spouse may have stopped working;
• children may have been raised;
• one spouse may have developed a successful business;
• the other may have sacrificed career opportunities;
• or the parties’ financial positions may be dramatically different.

Whether those changes affect enforceability depends on the agreement and applicable state law.

Some legal standards focus heavily on the circumstances at the time of execution; others may examine circumstances existing when enforcement is sought.

---

Long-Term Marriage and Prenuptial Agreements

The length of the marriage can become relevant even though it does not automatically invalidate a prenup.

A court may be asked to consider how the agreement operates after decades of marriage.

For example:

A spouse waived certain financial rights in a prenup signed before a 30-year marriage. At divorce, that waiver would leave the spouse with substantially fewer resources than expected under ordinary marital-property rules.

Whether the provision remains enforceable depends on the governing law.

The key point is that the passage of time can make enforcement disputes more factually complex.

---

Modification and Revocation

Prenuptial agreements can sometimes be modified or revoked after marriage.

A later agreement may be called a postnuptial agreement.

Whether modification or revocation is valid depends on applicable law and the formal requirements for changing the original agreement.

A later agreement may also create a new enforcement dispute.

Courts may examine:

• consent;
• disclosure;
• coercion;
• consideration where required;
• and other contractual requirements.

---

Choice-of-Law Provisions

A prenup may contain a choice-of-law clause identifying which jurisdiction’s law the parties intend to govern the agreement.

For example:

“This agreement shall be governed by the laws of State X.”

Such a clause can be important when the parties:

• live in different states;
• move after marriage;
• own property in several jurisdictions;
• or divorce in a state different from where they married.

However, a choice-of-law provision does not necessarily guarantee that every court will apply the chosen law in every circumstance.

Conflicts-of-law principles and public policy may affect the result.

---

Prenuptial Agreements and Interstate Couples

Modern couples frequently move between states.

This creates potential questions such as:

• Which state’s law governs?
• Was the agreement valid where it was signed?
• Will another state recognize it?
• Does the new state have different rules concerning support?
• Does the new state apply a different standard for unconscionability?

These issues can become especially significant when the agreement was drafted under one state’s law but enforced in another.

---

Electronic Prenuptial Agreements

Modern contracting increasingly involves electronic documents and electronic signatures.

Whether an electronic prenup satisfies applicable formal requirements depends on state law.

The existence of electronic-signature statutes does not necessarily answer every family-law question because some legal documents are subject to additional requirements.

The important principle is that formal validity must be evaluated under the law governing the agreement.

---

Can a Prenup Be Partially Enforced?

Potentially, yes.

Some agreements contain numerous independent provisions.

A court may determine that:

• some provisions are enforceable;
• another provision is invalid;
• and the invalid provision can be separated from the remainder.

Whether partial enforcement is available depends on state law and the language of the agreement.

This means that a challenge to one provision does not necessarily destroy the entire agreement.

---

Severability

A severability clause may state that if one provision is invalid, the remaining provisions should continue in effect.

Such a clause can be useful, but it does not automatically require a court to preserve every remaining provision.

The court must still apply the applicable law.

The question is often whether the invalid provision can be separated without undermining the agreement as a whole.

---

Enforcement After Death

Prenuptial agreements can apply not only to divorce but also to death.

They may address:

• inheritance rights;
• elective-share rights;
• separate property;
• estate claims;
• beneficiary interests;
• and rights against an estate.

A surviving spouse may therefore encounter the prenup during probate rather than divorce.

This makes careful drafting particularly important for couples whose primary concern is estate planning.

---

Prenups and Estate Planning

A prenuptial agreement should not be viewed as a replacement for estate planning.

The two instruments can work together.

A couple may need:

• a will;
• a trust;
• beneficiary designations;
• powers of attorney;
• healthcare directives;
• and a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement.

The agreement may establish what rights a spouse has, while estate-planning documents determine how particular assets are transferred.

Consistency between the documents can be critical.

---

Prenuptial Agreements and Businesses

Business ownership is one of the most common reasons people consider a prenup.

An agreement may attempt to clarify:

• whether a business is separate property;
• whether appreciation is separate or marital;
• whether the other spouse will receive an ownership interest;
• how business income is treated;
• or how the business will be valued in a divorce.

These provisions can become particularly important when a business increases substantially in value during the marriage.

State law determines what rights a spouse would otherwise have.

---

Prenuptial Agreements and Debt

Prenups can also address responsibility for debt.

For example, an agreement may distinguish between:

• premarital debt;
• marital debt;
• business debt;
• student loans;
• credit-card obligations;
• and debts incurred individually.

But a private agreement between spouses does not necessarily bind third-party creditors.

This distinction is critical.

A prenup may allocate responsibility between the spouses, while a creditor may retain rights under applicable contract and debt law.

---

Prenuptial Agreements and Separate Property

One of the most common purposes of a prenup is to establish or reinforce separate-property rights.

Separate property may include:

• assets owned before marriage;
• certain inheritances;
• gifts;
• business interests;
• or other property recognized as separate under state law.

A prenup can establish contractual rules concerning how those assets will be treated.

But the agreement must still satisfy the legal requirements for enforceability.

---

Prenuptial Agreements and Financial Transparency

A strong prenup process generally involves transparency.

The parties should be able to identify the financial landscape before agreeing to change their future legal rights.

That can involve documentation concerning:

• assets;
• debts;
• income;
• businesses;
• investments;
• retirement accounts;
• and other significant financial interests.

The precise disclosure obligations depend on applicable law.

But transparency serves an important legal function:

It supports informed consent.

---

A Hypothetical Enforcement Dispute

Consider the following example.

Taylor owns a successful business before marrying Jordan.

Six months before the wedding, Taylor and Jordan begin discussing a prenuptial agreement.

Taylor provides Jordan with detailed information concerning the business, investments, real estate, income, and debts.

Jordan hires an independent attorney.

The parties negotiate for several months.

Jordan ultimately signs the agreement voluntarily.

Twenty years later, they divorce.

Jordan challenges the prenup, arguing that it is unfavorable.

A court would not necessarily invalidate it merely because the result is financially unfavorable.

The court might instead examine:

• whether the agreement complied with state law;
• whether both parties had capacity;
• whether consent was voluntary;
• whether adequate disclosure occurred;
• whether Jordan had an opportunity for independent legal advice;
• whether the terms were unconscionable under the applicable standard;
• and whether any particular provision violates public policy.

Now change the facts.

Suppose Taylor presented the agreement the night before the wedding, concealed millions of dollars in assets, and threatened to cancel the wedding if Jordan refused to sign.

The enforcement analysis could be dramatically different.

The document itself has not changed.

The circumstances surrounding its creation have.

That illustrates why enforceability is about more than signatures.

---

A Practical Enforceability Checklist

When analyzing a prenuptial agreement, consider the following:

Formation

• Was the agreement in writing?
• Was it properly signed?
• Were required formalities satisfied?

Capacity

• Could both parties legally enter into the agreement?

Voluntariness

• Was either person pressured?
• Was there coercion or duress?
• Was the agreement presented at the last moment?

Disclosure

• Were significant assets disclosed?
• Were debts disclosed?
• Was income disclosed?
• Was business ownership disclosed?

Legal advice

• Did each party have independent counsel?
• Did each party have sufficient opportunity to obtain advice?

Understanding

• Were the provisions understandable?
• Did the parties understand what rights they were giving up?

Fairness

• Are the terms unconscionable under the applicable state law?
• Was the agreement unfair when made?
• Does the governing law consider circumstances at enforcement?

Scope

• Does the agreement attempt to control matters that private parties cannot legally determine?

Jurisdiction

• Which state’s law applies?
• Does another state or country have an interest?

Later changes

• Has the agreement been amended?
• Was it revoked?
• Has a postnuptial agreement replaced or modified it?

This framework identifies the major issues but does not substitute for the law of the particular jurisdiction.

---

Common Misconceptions

“If both spouses signed, the prenup is automatically enforceable.”

No. Signature is important, but enforceability can depend on many additional factors.

“A prenup must be equal.”

Not necessarily. Parties can deliberately allocate property and financial rights differently, subject to applicable legal limits.

“An unfair agreement is automatically invalid.”

Not necessarily. Courts apply specific legal standards concerning unconscionability and other defects.

“Independent lawyers are always legally required.”

Not in every jurisdiction or circumstance. But independent counsel can be extremely important.

“A prenup can decide child custody.”

Generally, parents cannot conclusively determine future custody through a private premarital contract because courts must apply the governing child-welfare standards.

“A prenup automatically protects everything owned before marriage.”

Not necessarily. Protection depends on the agreement’s language and applicable property law.

“A prenup eliminates all financial disputes in divorce.”

No. Questions concerning interpretation, classification, valuation, enforcement, and changed circumstances can still produce litigation.

“A prenup is only relevant in divorce.”

No. It may also affect rights arising from death and estate administration.

---

Why Prenuptial Agreements Are Closely Examined

Prenuptial agreements occupy an unusual position in contract law.

They are contracts, but they concern an intimate legal relationship involving:

• marriage;
• property;
• family responsibilities;
• economic dependency;
• inheritance;
• and divorce.

That is why courts may scrutinize them differently from ordinary commercial contracts.

Two businesses negotiating a contract may have relatively similar bargaining environments.

Two people preparing for marriage may face very different emotional, financial, and informational circumstances.

The law therefore attempts to balance two competing principles:

Freedom of contract

Adults should generally be able to arrange their financial affairs according to their preferences.

Protection against unfair contracting

People should not lose substantial legal rights through fraud, coercion, inadequate disclosure, or other circumstances that undermine genuine consent.

Prenuptial-agreement law exists in the space between these principles.

---

The Difference Between Validity and Enforceability

The concepts of validity and enforceability are related but should not be confused.

A prenuptial agreement may be challenged on the ground that it was never validly formed.

Alternatively, a particular provision may exist in a valid agreement but nevertheless be unenforceable because the law does not permit that provision to operate in the circumstances.

The distinction can be expressed simply:

Validity asks whether a legally effective agreement exists. Enforceability asks whether a court will give legal effect to it.

The precise terminology varies among jurisdictions, but the conceptual distinction is useful.

---

The Role of Courts

When enforcement is disputed, a court may have to reconstruct events that occurred years or even decades earlier.

The court may examine:

• the agreement itself;
• financial disclosures;
• correspondence;
• drafts;
• attorney communications where discoverable;
• testimony;
• execution records;
• and evidence concerning the parties’ circumstances.

The court’s task is not simply to decide whether the agreement seems fair today.

It must apply the governing legal standards to the agreement and the circumstances surrounding it.

---

Key Takeaways

• A signed prenuptial agreement is not automatically enforceable.
• Enforceability depends heavily on state law.
• Written documentation and proper execution are fundamental.
• Voluntary consent is critical.
• Duress can undermine enforceability.
• Timing can matter, particularly when an agreement is presented immediately before a wedding.
• Financial disclosure can be essential to informed consent.
• Independent legal counsel can provide important protection and may be required in certain circumstances.
• Fraud and misrepresentation can undermine an agreement.
• Unconscionability can provide grounds for challenging particularly oppressive agreements.
• Child custody and child support generally cannot be conclusively controlled by a private prenup.
• Public policy can limit contractual freedom.
• Choice-of-law provisions can become important when couples move between states.
• A prenup can address divorce as well as death and inheritance.
• One invalid provision does not necessarily invalidate the entire agreement.
• The circumstances surrounding formation can be as important as the document itself.
• The rules governing enforceability vary significantly among states.

Conclusion

The enforceability of a prenuptial agreement depends on much more than whether two people signed a document before getting married. Courts may examine the entire process by which the agreement was created: whether the parties acted voluntarily, whether they had adequate financial information, whether they had meaningful opportunities to obtain legal advice, whether the terms are unconscionable, and whether the agreement complies with the law of the relevant jurisdiction.

A well-drafted prenup can provide substantial certainty by allowing spouses to determine important financial consequences before a dispute arises. But contractual freedom in family law is not unlimited. The law protects the integrity of consent and may refuse to enforce provisions that violate statutory requirements, public policy, or other recognized legal limitations.

The most important principle is therefore simple:

A prenuptial agreement is not enforceable merely because it was signed; it is enforceable when it satisfies the legal requirements governing its formation, content, and enforcement.

That distinction makes prenuptial agreements a particularly revealing subject in family law. They demonstrate how ordinary principles of contract—consent, disclosure, capacity, fairness, and enforceability—interact with the special legal status of marriage.